Student accurately and in some detail described 2 ethical dilemmas that a forensic digital practitioner may encounter.

Student accurately and in some detail provided steps they should take to ensure their integrity isn’t questioned.

The writing indicates effort above and beyond in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, and other perspectives.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been only adequate in limited incidences, the student generally displayed superior critical thinking and superior command of this subject and discussion. Positions were generally supported by appropriate sources.

Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points Available: 19.2-21.5

Student accurately described 2 ethical dilemmas that a forensic digital practitioner may encounter.

Student accurately provided steps they should take to ensure their integrity isn’t questioned.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been limited on occasion, the student displayed adequate critical thinking and adequate command of this subject and discussion. Most positions taken were adequately supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge indicates a general understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Terminology usage is generally correct.

Points available: 16.8-19.1

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described 2 ethical dilemmas that a forensic digital practitioner may encounter.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently provided steps they should take to ensure their integrity isn’t questioned.

The writing demonstrates less than sufficient work and does not generally reflect an adequate understanding of the content.

The student generally displayed limited critical thinking and limited command of this subject and discussion. The student generally made limited connections between the material and the answers to the prompts and positions taken were largely not supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge does not generally demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Most terminology was used incorrectly or insufficiently to indicate an adequate understanding of the concepts.

Points available D: 14.4-16.7

Points available F: 0-14.3

Student accurately and in some detail described cloud storage and its importance to investigators.

Student accurately and in some detail described how investigators can preserve and gain access to cloud data.

Student accurately and in detail explained why investigators do or do not need legal authorization for cloud data AND why.

The writing indicates effort above and beyond in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, and other perspectives.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been only adequate in limited incidences, the student generally displayed superior critical thinking and superior command of this subject and discussion. Positions were generally supported by appropriate sources.

Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points Available: 28.8-32.3

Student accurately described cloud storage and its importance to investigators.

Student accurately described how investigators can preserve and gain access to cloud data.

Student accurately explained why investigators do or do not need legal authorization for cloud data AND why.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been limited on occasion, the student displayed adequate critical thinking and adequate command of this subject and discussion. Most positions taken were adequately supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge indicates a general understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Terminology usage is generally correct.

Points available: 25.2-28.7

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described cloud storage and its importance to investigators.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described how investigators can preserve and gain access to cloud data.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently explained why investigators do or do not need legal authorization for cloud data and why.

The writing demonstrates less than sufficient work and does not generally reflect an adequate understanding of the content.

The student generally displayed limited critical thinking and limited command of this subject and discussion. The student generally made limited connections between the material and the answers to the prompts and positions taken were largely not supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge does not generally demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Most terminology was used incorrectly or insufficiently to indicate an adequate understanding of the concepts.

Points available D: 21.6-25.1

Points available F: 0-21.5

Student accurately and in some detail described 3 IoT Devices.

Student accurately and in some detail described the 3 IoT devices’ functionality to include the problem the device addresses for its users.

Student accurately and in some detail explained the data that may be available from each of the 3 IoT devices.

Student accurately and in some detail described where IoT data may be found AND how it can be acquired.

The writing indicates effort above and beyond in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, and other perspectives.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been only adequate in limited incidences, the student generally displayed superior critical thinking and superior command of this subject and discussion. Positions were generally supported by appropriate sources.

Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points Available: 38.4-43.1

Student accurately described 3 IoT Devices.

Student accurately described the 3 IoT devices’ functionality to include the problem the device addresses for its users.

Student accurately explained the data that may be available from each of the 3 IoT devices.

Student accurately described where IoT data may be found AND how it can be acquired.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been limited on occasion, the student displayed adequate critical thinking and adequate command of this subject and discussion. Most positions taken were adequately supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge indicates a general understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Terminology usage is generally correct.

Points available: 33.6-38.3

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described 3 IoT Devices.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described the 3 IoT devices’ functionality to include the problem the device addresses for its users.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently explained the data that may be available from each of the 3 IoT devices.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described where IoT data may be found and how it can be acquired.

The writing demonstrates less than sufficient work and does not generally reflect an adequate understanding of the content.

The student generally displayed limited critical thinking and limited command of this subject and discussion. The student generally made limited connections between the material and the answers to the prompts and positions taken were largely not supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge does not generally demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Most terminology was used incorrectly or insufficiently to indicate an adequate understanding of the concepts.

Points available D: 28.8-33.5

Points available F: 0-28.7

Student accurately and in some detail described how drones may be used by criminals and terrorists.

Student accurately and in some detail described how LE can combat the illegal use of drones.

Student accurately and in some detail explained where drones store data AND what types of information may be found.

The writing indicates effort above and beyond in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, and other perspectives.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been only adequate in limited incidences, the student generally displayed superior critical thinking and superior command of this subject and discussion. Positions were generally supported by appropriate sources.

Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points Available: 28.8-32.3

Student accurately described how drones may be used by criminals and terrorists.

Student accurately described how LE can combat the illegal use of drones.

Student accurately explained where drones store data AND what types of information may be found.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been limited on occasion, the student displayed adequate critical thinking and adequate command of this subject and discussion. Most positions taken were adequately supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge indicates a general understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Terminology usage is generally correct.

Points available: 25.2-28.7

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described how drones may be used by criminals and terrorists.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described how LE can combat the illegal use of drones.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently explained where drones store data AND what types of information may be found.

The writing demonstrates less than sufficient work and does not generally reflect an adequate understanding of the content.

The student generally displayed limited critical thinking and limited command of this subject and discussion. The student generally made limited connections between the material and the answers to the prompts and positions taken were largely not supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge does not generally demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Most terminology was used incorrectly or insufficiently to indicate an adequate understanding of the concepts.

Points available D: 21.6-25.1

Points available F: 0-21.5

Student accurately and in some detail described two new or emerging technologies.

Student accurately and in some detail described how each of the 2 technologies may be used for illegal activity.

Student accurately and in some detail described how LE can combat the illegal use of each of the 2 technologies.

The writing indicates effort above and beyond in the areas of research, analysis, critical thinking, and other perspectives.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been only adequate in limited incidences, the student generally displayed superior critical thinking and superior command of this subject and discussion. Positions were generally supported by appropriate sources.

Clear application of theory and knowledge to the facts.

Most terminology references are correctly applied.

Points Available: 28.8-32.3

Student accurately described two new or emerging technologies.

Student accurately described how each of the 2 technologies may be used for illegal activity.

Student accurately described how LE can combat the illegal use of each of the 2 technologies.

While critical thinking, command of the material, or connections made may have been limited on occasion, the student displayed adequate critical thinking and adequate command of this subject and discussion. Most positions taken were adequately supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge indicates a general understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Terminology usage is generally correct.

Points available: 25.2-28.7

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described two new or emerging technologies.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described how each of the 2 technologies may be used for illegal activity.

Student inaccurately or insufficiently described how LE can combat the illegal use of each of the 2 technologies.

The writing demonstrates less than sufficient work and does not generally reflect an adequate understanding of the content.

The student generally displayed limited critical thinking and limited command of this subject and discussion. The student generally made limited connections between the material and the answers to the prompts and positions taken were largely not supported by appropriate sources.

Application of theory and knowledge does not generally demonstrate an understanding of the concepts and focus of the assignment.

Most terminology was used incorrectly or insufficiently to indicate an adequate understanding of the concepts.

Points available D: 21.6-25.1

Points available F: 0-21.5

Student mostly followed APA and format requirements for this assignment but had up to 2 errors.

Student mostly followed the instructions for this assignment. Errors were minor.

Student used at least 3 appropriate resources overall to inform their thoughts and opinions for this assignment.

Points available: 16-17.9

Student mostly followed APA and format requirements for this assignment but had up to 3 errors.

Student mostly followed the instructions for this assignment.

Student used 2 or fewer appropriate resources overall to inform their thoughts and opinions for this assignment.

Points available: 14-15.9

Student did not generally follow APA format requirements for this assignment.

Student did not generally follow the instructions for this assignment.

Student used 1 or fewer appropriate resources overall to inform their thoughts and opinions for this assignment.

Points available D: 12-13.9

Points available F: 0-11.9

Writing quality in terms of grammar, punctuation, usage, structure, spacing, etc. as well as reader engagement is good.

Student had few writing, grammar, or spelling errors.

Points available: : 20-22.4

Writing quality in terms of grammar, punctuation, usage, structure, spacing, etc. as well as reader engagement is adequate.

Student had several writing, grammar, or spelling errors.

Points available: 17.5-19.9

Writing quality in terms of grammar, punctuation, usage, structure, spacing, etc. as well as reader engagement is inadequate or contains many errors that disrupt flow an understanding of the presentation.

Student did not meet writing, grammar, and/or spelling expectations.

Points available D: 15-17.4

Points available F: 0-14.9