Paper was formatted in APA style

Paper was missing one of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page).

Paper was missing two of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page).

Paper was missing three of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page).

Paper was missing four of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page).

Paper was missing five of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page).

Paper was complete, evidence of facts supported by research with internal citations and information presented was accurate.

Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with one of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained.

Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with two of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained.

Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with three of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained.

Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with four of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained.

Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with five or more of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained.

Evaluation matrix was completely and accurately create in Excel using formulas.

Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with one of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper.

Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with two of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper.

Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with three of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper.

Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with four of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper.

Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with five of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper.