RPaper-INT 2840-Submit your Word and Excel files here for the Phase 5 of the course research paper.
Grading Point Distribution for Phase 5, the Written Word Paper and Excel worksheet:
Paper in Word– 70
APA format – 10
Content – 60
Matrix in Excel – 30
| RPaper-INT 2840-Research Paper Rubric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|
APA Format
|
10 pts
APA Full Marks
Paper was formatted in APA style 9 pts
9/10 for APA formatting
Paper was missing one of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page). 8 pts
8/10 for APA formatting
Paper was missing two of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page). 7 pts
7/10 for APA formatting
Paper was missing three of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page). 6 pts
6/10 for APA Formatting
Paper was missing four of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page). 5 pts
5/10 for APA formatting
Paper was missing five of the following APA formatting features or the feature was not correct: title page, abstract (summary of paper), page numbers, running header, internal citations and Works Cited (reference page). |
/ 10 pts
|
|
Content
|
60 pts
Content Full Marks
Paper was complete, evidence of facts supported by research with internal citations and information presented was accurate. 50 pts
50/60 for Content
Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with one of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained. 40 pts
40/60 for Content
Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with two of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained. 30 pts
30/60 for Content
Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with three of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained. 20 pts
20/60 for Content
Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with four of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained. 10 pts
10/60 for Content
Body of the paper was missing or there were issues with five or more of the following: internal citations showing research was used support facts, information presented was accurate/error free, topic was explained well, criteria explained well, alternatives were carefully described, and results of evaluation matrix were completely explained. |
/ 60 pts
|
|
Evaluation Matrix
|
30 pts
Evaluation Matrix Full Marks
Evaluation matrix was completely and accurately create in Excel using formulas. 25 pts
25/30
Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with one of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper. 20 pts
20/30 for Evaluation Matrix
Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with two of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper. 15 pts
15/30 for Evaluation Matrix
Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with three of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper. 10 pts
10/30
Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with four of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper. 5 pts
5/30 for Evaluation Matrix
Evaluation matrix create in Excel was missing or there were issues with five of the following: no rows or columns were skipped, totals were created using the SUM function, the weighted scores were created using a formulas with a mixed cell reference, the Excel file is formatted well and Excel element(s) were included in the research paper Word file where the scores are discussed in the paper. |
/ 30 pts
|
| Total Points: 0 | ||
Answer Preview-RPaper-INT 2840
